The Network Effect: How Platforms Lift Value

An integrated social platform is at the epicenter of Groupon. Despite the more than 600 sites offering daily coupons for a limited-time, Groupon continues to consistently drive revenue (Techcrunch, 2015).

The Network Effect: Platform for Growth

Groupon’s use of social platforms encourages mobile adoption through incentives and built communities that benefit from network effects, increasing discounts as others join (Byung-Choel, Jeongsik, & Park, 2013). Low switching costs coupled with open information platform systems exposes opportunities that only technology can unlock. Low entry barriers promote value extensions by creating relationships between merchants and consumers.

Technology and business process integration is a critical element of Groupon’s success and operational vision for continual growth. Although a rip-and-replace approach sounds logical, this model would prove ineffective when absorbing new lines of business because of the uniqueness of each business acquisition. Allowing new Groupon entities to continue operating as primarily independent, is a strategic decision and preserves the start-up mentality and harnesses the energy that rigid corporate structures would erode. Groupon’s Lego approach to building customer interest and monetizing network effects revolve around acquisitions. Over the last 5 years, acquisitions have driven a competitive advantages for Groupon by purchasing technical capabilities in order to innovate and compete with industry competitors. From the start in Q2 2010, when Groupon took shape at $38.7MM to current revenues in Q3 2015 of $714.0MM, Groupon established itself as an industry wide low cost leader through acquisition and has assembled an integrated social platform (Statista, 2015). Groupon has made thirty-three acquisitions between Jan 2010 and May 2015 building strategic strength (Crunchbase, 2014; Boomerang Commerce, 2015).

Extensions of existing social networks is a primary objective of the Groupon operational vision by reaching beyond the United States. Groupon’s acquisitions are global. From the beginning in 2010 Groupon was looking for opportunities outside the United States, when they teamed up with Digital Sky Technologies of Russia and raised $135MM of new venture capital. Groupon’s most recent purchase of Swarm Mobile based out of San Francisco, CA provides shopper analytics and omni-channel marketing but global acquisitions abound including: CityDeal in Germany, Needish and ClanDescuento in Chile, in Indonesia, Crowdmass in Australia, Beeconomic in Singapore, Darberry in Moscow, OpenCal in British Columbia, TMON in Korea, and Blink in Spain.

Value Realization from the Network Effect: Two-Sided Markets

“Armchair calculations of non-paying customers value can lead to flawed strategies” (Gupta & Mela, 2008, p. 109). Groupon is not building customer lifetime value.

However, making money by giving things away is not new. Monetizing FREE is the spirit of platform competition in two-sided markets, where the value of a product shifts with the number of users. Facebook and Twitter are both good examples of this platform competition. A classic example of a two-sided markets is the credit card linking consumers and merchants. In order to build value the two groups of users in this case the consumers and merchants need to be brought together. Products and services that align groups of users in a two-sided network is called a platform. These platforms provide the foundational infrastructure to link groups of users. The platforms do not need to be always digital or online to demonstrate value. In the example of a Shopping Mall which connects shoppers and stores, this illustrates a ‘shopping’ platform. Another example of platforms are gas stations that first came out in 1905, later aligning the owners of the Model-T with the needed gas required for fueling their transportation.

“In traditional value chains, value moves from left to right: To the left of the company is cost; to the right is revenue. In two-sided networks, cost and revenue are both to the left and the right” (Eisenmann, Parker, Van Alstyne, 2006, p. 1). Groupon knows that in order to realize this revenue on both or typically one side of the network, a platform is required. This desire to monetize the network effect is driving their acquisition strategy. But is this a sustainable competitive advantage? Yes.

Marshall W. Van Alstyne, research associate at the MIT Initiative on the Digital Economy, is one of the top world’s foremost experts on platform strategies and was among the first to measure individual dollar output from social networks and IT. His theories on network businesses are now taught worldwide. The essence of these network business models explain the value proposition linking increasing users with an increase in platform value. Although we may normally categorize network businesses in this way, we do see these models in use every day and they are booming. LinkedIn has a two-sided network of giving away resume listings but charging for power searches. Amazon Associates give away free content, while earning referral fees. Travelocity gives away some travel services, but gets a share if you rent a hotel and car on the same trip. Van Alstyne suggests that despite the ubiquity of network businesses, the strategic value has largely gone unexplored. (Eisenmann, Parker, Van Alstyne,  2006). If we see value in LinkedIn and Travelocity, there might be room yet for Groupon.



Advertising agencies; groupon, inc. files SEC form 4, statement of changes in beneficial ownership of securities (may. 12, 2015). (2015). Marketing Weekly News, 487.

American banking and market news: Analysts’ recent ratings changes for groupon (GRPN). (2015). (). Chatham, United States, Chatham: Newstex.

Boomerang commerce. (2015). fast-growing boomerang commerce adds office depot, sears, and groupon as customers, makes key executive hires to fuel growth. (2015). Marketing Weekly News, 48.

Brosseau, M. (2013). Intro to Networks and Network Theory (online image). Retrieved January 6, 2016, from

Buchler, D., Downey, J. ., Goldstein, A., Kheyfets, A., Monitz, L., & Truong, T.-M. (2011). Groupon: What a Deal. Retrieved from

Byung-Choel, K., Jeongsik, L., & Park, H. (2013). Dynamic Platform Competition in a Two-Sided Market: Evidence from the Online Daily Deals Promotion Industry, 1–44.

Crunchbase. (2014). Groupon – Acquisitions. Retrieved from

DeLuca, S. (2009). Leadership orientation style and use of power: A study of new jersey male superintendents (Ed.D.). Available from ProQuest Central. (819688780).

Do, Q. N. (2011). Reframing organizations: Artistry, choice, and leadership (4th ed). Journal of Business Studies Quarterly, 2(3), 99-100.

Edelman, B., Jaffe, S., & Kominers, S. D. (2014). To Groupon or Not to Groupon: The Profitability of Deep Discounts. Harvard Business School, 11-063, 1–23.

Elahi, A., & Blue Sky reporter. (2014, Oct 23, 2014). Groupon pages launches, aims to build appeal. Chicago Tribune

Gerson, M. (2015, May 7, 2015). Barrington’s groupon confusion: What’s the deal with tmon? Benzinga Newswires

Girotra, K., Marinesi, S., & Netessine, S. (2013). Can Groupon Save Its Business Model? – HBR. Retrieved from

Grant, K. B. (2011). Why Groupon Competitors are Bad for Customers – Pay Dirt – MarketWatch. Retrieved from

Groupon appoints SVPs of human resources and consumer product. (2015, Mar 17, 2015). Business Wire

Groupon class A: Breadcrumb launches breadcrumb live, an iPhone app for restaurant owners to keep tabs on their business. (2015, May 19, 2015). News Bites – Media & Broadcasting

Groupon names 2 new SVPs. (2015). Professional Services Close – Up, , n/a.

Groupon, inc. (2015). (). Austin, United States, Austin: Dun and Bradstreet, Inc.

Gupta, S., & Mela, C. F. (2008). What is a free Customer Worth? Harvard Business Review, Nov, 102–109.

Lancellotti-Young, C. (2011). Goupon: Case #6-0034. Tuck School of Business at Dartmouth: Glassmeyer/McNamee Center for Digital Strategies, 1–14.

McGrath, R. (2011a). Groupon’s Business Model Is Leaking – HBR. Retrieved from

McGrath, R. (2011b). The Problem with Groupon’s Business Model – HBR. Retrieved from

Mohammed, R. (2012a). How to Save Groupon – HBR. Retrieved from

Mohammed, R. (2012b). In Search of the Ideal Groupon Discount – HBR. Retrieved from

Riley, K. (2015, Apr 14, 2015). Pro: I’m bearish on groupon. Benzinga Newswires.

Statista. (2015). Groupon: quarterly revenue 2015 | Statistic. Retrieved from (2014). cloud-supply-chain-1.jpg (310×200, online image). Retrieved

Swanson, J. (2015, May 6, 2015). What the street thinks of groupon. Benzinga Newswires.

Teixeira, T. S. (2014). The Rising Cost of Consumer Attention: Why You Should Care, and What You Can Do about It. Harvard Business School, 14-055, 1–23.

ValueWalk: MLB’s philadelphia phillies use groupon to improve spectator turnout. (2015).

Weill, P., & Ross, J. W. (2009). IT Savvy: What Top Executives Must Know to Go from pain to Gain. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press.



Peter Nichol, empowers organizations to think different for different results. You can follow Peter on Twitter or on his blog. Peter can be reached at pnichol [dot]

Previous articleMIT Sloan – Blurring the Lines Between IT and Business from Mendix
Next articleAgile Framework – Be Unreasonably Aspirational
Peter is a technology executive with 19 years of experience, dedicated to driving innovation, digital transformation, leadership, and data in business. He helps organizations connect strategy to execution to maximize company performance. He has been recognized for Digital Innovation by CIO 100, MIT Sloan, Computerworld, and the Project Management Institute. As Managing Director at OROCA Innovations, Peter leads the CXO advisory services practice, driving digital strategies. Peter was honored as an MIT Sloan CIO Leadership Award Finalist in 2015 and is a regular contributor to on innovation. Peter has led businesses through complex changes, including the adoption of data-first approaches for portfolio management, lean six sigma for operational excellence, departmental transformations, process improvements, maximizing team performance, designing new IT operating models, digitizing platforms, leading large-scale mission-critical technology deployments, product management, agile methodologies, and building high-performance teams. As Chief Information Officer, Peter was responsible for Connecticut’s Health Insurance Exchange’s (HIX) industry-leading digital platform transforming consumerism and retail oriented services for the health insurance industry. Peter championed the Connecticut marketplace digital implementation with a transformational cloud-based SaaS platform and mobile application recognized as a 2014 PMI Project of the Year Award finalist, CIO 100, and awards for best digital services, API, and platform. He also received a lifetime achievement award for leadership and digital transformation, honored as a 2016 Computerworld Premier 100 IT Leader. Peter is the author of Learning Intelligence: Expand Thinking. Absorb Alternative. Unlock Possibilities (2017), which Marshall Goldsmith, author of the New York Times No. 1 bestseller Triggers, calls "a must-read for any leader wanting to compete in the innovation-powered landscape of today." Peter also authored The Power of Blockchain for Healthcare: How Blockchain Will Ignite The Future of Healthcare (2017), the first book to explore the vast opportunities for blockchain to transform the patient experience. Peter has a B.S. in C.I.S from Bentley University and an MBA from Quinnipiac University, where he graduated Summa Cum Laude. He earned his PMP® in 2001 and is a certified Six Sigma Master Black Belt, Masters in Business Relationship Management (MBRM) and Certified Scrum Master. As a Commercial Rated Aviation Pilot and Master Scuba Diver, Peter understands first hand, how to anticipate change and lead boldly.